![]() Once you determine which of the many toolpaths your going to use most of the time, it's pretty straightforward. We've been running RhinoCam for a couple of months and I'm relieved to announce that the learning curve is not nearly as steep as some report it to be. I figure if it is good enough for GM and NASA, then it is more then enough for me! Never in over 4 years did I have to wait more than 8 hours for a problem to be solved by Mecsoft. They will use, connect to your computer and modify the PP right there in front of you in some instances. ![]() I never was given a project that I could not accomplish with the Mecsoft products.Īs for PP, not only does Mecsoft provide PP for just about every machine imagineable, their tech support will go above and beyond to configure your PP for whatever application you want. When I left NEW WAVE I was using Visual Mill 6.0 and Rhincam. It is a mid level CAM program that is proven. The cost difference is nominal when you compare it to the features of a similar program. If you already have Rhino and are familiar with it and will be doing 4th axis, then go with RhinoCam 2.0. ![]() I do have Rhino, but I can use those models in either CAM package. I've tried demos of them all, and I like the Vectric simplicity, and the fact that it costs less doesn't hurt, either.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |